Reddit is the single best public source of people describing a problem before they know what to call it. It is also the platform most likely to remove your post, ban your account and leave you unsure which rule you broke.
Both facts have the same cause: Reddit is a federation of communities that set their own rules, sitting on top of a site-wide policy that is deliberately general. There is no single rulebook. There is a site-wide floor, a widely cited convention, and then several thousand local regimes that override both.
Here is what each layer actually says.
Layer one: the site-wide floor
Reddit's Content Policy is short and the relevant part is Rule 2, which requires that you "post authentic content into communities where you have a personal interest, and do not cheat or engage in content manipulation (including spamming, vote manipulation, ban evasion, or subscriber fraud)."
Three things in that sentence get people banned:
- Authentic content. Posts written to look like a user question, that are actually an advert, violate this. So does a fake testimonial, and so does a second account agreeing with your first one.
- Where you have a personal interest. Joining a subreddit the day you post into it is visible to moderators and reads exactly as what it is.
- Content manipulation. Upvoting your own posts from another account, asking colleagues to, and buying engagement are all the same offence.
Site-wide enforcement is quiet. Content can be removed without notification, and accounts can be restricted in ways that are not obvious from inside the account: your posts exist when you are logged in and nobody else can see them. Repeated violations escalate to a permanent ban.
Layer two: the 9:1 convention
The reddiquette guidance that everyone cites: for roughly every one post linking to your own thing, contribute nine that are not. It is a convention rather than an enforced mechanism (nothing counts for you automatically), but moderators absolutely use it as the benchmark, and several subreddit automod configurations approximate it.
The spirit is better captured by the line reddiquette is remembered for: it is fine to be a redditor with a website; it is not fine to be a website with a Reddit account. If more than about 10% of your activity is your own stuff, you read as the second thing.
The practical consequence is that this is a slow motion. An account that can usefully participate in a community is one that has been participating for months. There is no way to shortcut that which does not eventually get caught, and the shortcuts are exactly what the site-wide rule about authenticity exists to catch.
Layer three: the subreddit, which overrides everything
This is the layer that actually determines what happens to you, and it is the one no guide can summarise, because each community writes its own.
A study of 49 subreddits that founders commonly post into found that 61% either ban self-promotion outright or permit it only under the 9:1 rule. Many of the rest confine it to a weekly thread. Some allow it if you disclose affiliation in the comment. A few allow nothing resembling commerce under any circumstances, and say so in the sidebar that nobody reads.
So the first step in any Reddit motion is not writing anything. It is:
- Open the subreddit's rules, in the sidebar and the wiki, and read them.
- Search the subreddit for previous posts like the one you intend to make, and see whether they are still up.
- Look at whether the moderators have posted about self-promotion recently. They usually have, and usually in exasperation.
Where the rules are ambiguous, message the moderators and ask. It costs a day and it is the single highest-return thing in this entire post, because a moderator who told you yes is a moderator who will not remove your comment.
What automation may and may not do
This is where most tools in this space are quietly on the wrong side of a line, and where the question "is this allowed" has a clear answer that vendors avoid.
Reading publicly available content is fine. Reddit charges for commercial API access (from $0.24 per 1,000 API calls since 1 July 2023) and treats any monetised service touching the API as commercial use requiring an agreement. The cost of getting that wrong is not theoretical: GummySearch, a profitable business serving over 135,000 users, shut down in November 2025 because it could not reach a commercial licence agreement. We wrote about that in GummySearch shut down.
Automated posting, commenting, voting or messaging is not fine. It runs directly into Rule 2's content-manipulation clause, and it is the fastest route to a site-wide ban. Any tool that offers to auto-reply to threads on your behalf is offering to get your account banned on a schedule.
This is why Openpulse does none of it. It reads publicly available results, never logs in to any platform, never posts, never comments and never votes. It tells you a thread exists and why it might matter. Opening the thread, deciding whether the community would welcome a reply, and writing it in your own voice from your own account is your job, and that division is not a limitation we would remove if we could. It is the only version of this that is safe for the account you would be risking.
The reply that works
Assume you have found a thread where somebody describes a problem you solve, and the subreddit permits commercial participation. The difference between a reply that earns a customer and one that gets you banned is almost entirely structure.
Answer the question first, completely, as if you sold nothing. Most of the reply should be useful to somebody who will never buy from you, including the part about how to solve the problem without any tool at all. If you cannot write that paragraph, you do not understand the problem well enough to be in the thread.
Disclose in plain words. "I build one of these, so discount me accordingly" costs you nothing and removes the single most common reason comments get removed. Communities forgive a disclosed interest and punish a concealed one.
Mention your product once, late, and only if it is genuinely the answer. If a competitor is the better fit for their described situation, say that. This sounds like a moral instruction and it is actually a tactical one: it is the single most persuasive thing you can do in a public thread, and everybody reading it can tell whether you meant it.
Do not link unless asked. A named product is searchable. A link is what automod removes.
Reply to replies. A comment that answers once and vanishes reads as a drive-by. The conversation after is where the actual buying decision happens.
What a realistic Reddit motion looks like
Uncomfortable, because it is slower than every tool in this category implies:
- Weeks one to four: participate without mentioning your product at all. Ten to fifteen genuinely useful comments across the communities that matter. This is the part people skip and it is the part that makes the rest work.
- Ongoing: two or three threads a week worth replying to, found by search rather than by scrolling. That is the part a tool can compress, from an hour a day of reading to a short list in the morning.
- Never: posting the same thing in multiple subreddits, DMing people who posted, creating a second account to agree with yourself, or letting anything automated touch the keyboard.
The honest expectation is that this produces a small number of high-quality conversations rather than a pipeline. People who report otherwise are usually describing a launch, once. What it is genuinely good for is the thing that compounds: the threads stay up, they rank in search, and somebody finds your answer eleven months later. See reddit lead generation for what that looks like as a standing motion.
See it on your own market
Paste your website, review the plan it proposes, and read what comes back tomorrow morning.
Questions about anything here? Email support@openpulse.cloud.